Because the IVA is an asset that was an asset during the IVA
The thinking from creditors is that had the debtor not paid the PPI premium then they may not have borrowed so much and/or may have repaid more before entering into an IVA
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by Andy Davie
Because the IVA is an asset that was an asset during the IVA
Do you mean
The PPI is an asset that existed during the IVA(doesn't matter when it's claimed, as it was claimable during IVA).
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by martjase
Although it seems that even 100p in the £ is not enough for these people.
It could be argued that 100p over 5/6 years is interest free credit for 5/6 years, if you didn't get the IVA think of the interest and fees you'd incur over that period. The alternative is bankruptcy which has higher fees I don't know how many get to 100p that route