CF new T&C's agree or not?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
21 posts Page 2 of 2
 
 

Tillergirl

User avatar
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:34 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Tillergirl » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:22 am
I meant the F&F offer reduced by number of additonal payments made! As I've been waiting 5 months!
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:13 pm
Make sure the offer reduces by any subsequent delays in case it takes months for this to be resolved.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

Tillergirl

User avatar
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:34 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Tillergirl » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:15 pm
Just spoken to Creditfix and told them I'm concerned about their fee increase as it means less money for my creditors. They have advised if creditors reject the amendment as they are not happy with fee increase then it simply reverts to original fees of 15% ?

I also enquired about the PPI variation as surely all PPI should be put into the pot for creditors? I said taking 50% of PPI away to give to debtor in addition to their fee increase was alot to ask from creditors but I was advised the variations are being put forward individually and therefore they have the option to accept or reject each one which sounds better?
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:21 pm
That is a lot better as at least if creditors reject some of the resolutions concerning loss of PPI income and massive fee hikes, they can still accept your variation on the original terms of the IVA. This means there would be no need for you to sign new T&Cs as any amendments can be proposed as individual resolutions at the meeting. Creditors can say yes or no.

I wonder does this mean that there will not be a mass variation meeting after all and each case will now be varied on an individual basis?
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

Tillergirl

User avatar
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:34 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Tillergirl » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:46 pm
I have still been advised I need to accept before they put my F&F forward and that the MVM mtg is due to be held in March. However, I got the distinct impression if I accept the ball will move more quickly.

I can't help but think the MVM is just a hoax to buy time. I did ask for a date of this MVM and was told March. But really I think March just came up as they need to give creditors 28 days notice of my variation mtg.
 
 

grimswold

User avatar
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:03 am
Location:

Post by grimswold » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:57 pm
This MVM why does it even matter because if we dont agree we dont agree. Is there more to this MVM than meets the eye or something.
21 posts Page 2 of 2
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”