IVA company refusing to issue termination certificate unless I take out PPI claim. Is this legal ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
171 posts Page 5 of 12
 
 

Shining

User avatar
Posts: 27019
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:57 am
Location:

Post by Shining » Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:53 pm
and equally with this post says he works with a legal firm who claims ppi - maybe too shy to say in the beginning

http://www.iva.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TO ... hichpage=1

http://www.iva.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TO ... hichpage=2
Last edited by Shining on Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
IVA final payment left the bank on the 26th January 2013...looking forward to a debt free future.
 
 

Niobe

User avatar
Posts: 5169
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:56 am
Location:

Post by Niobe » Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:55 pm
Methinks he's not a genuine poster!!!
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33395
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:12 pm
He has actually fessed up to working for a law firm processing PPI claims --- back in March.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Jamie.73

User avatar
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:11 pm
Location:

Post by Jamie.73 » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:12 pm
Started to work with the legal firm in June prior to that i was researching the area.
All views expressed are my own personal views. Without prejudice
 
 

Niobe

User avatar
Posts: 5169
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:56 am
Location:

Post by Niobe » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:17 pm
If you started working with them in June - how come Foggy has spotted that you worked for them in March?
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33395
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:17 pm
Jamie -- I take your point regarding the hidden work. However, many companies merely use a scattergun approach and put in claims willy nilly, hoping for an uncontested refund.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Niobe

User avatar
Posts: 5169
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:56 am
Location:

Post by Niobe » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:19 pm
 
 

Jamie.73

User avatar
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:11 pm
Location:

Post by Jamie.73 » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:27 pm
This is true and the MOJ have sent warning out to claims companies. In addition the SRA (our regulatory body) have also contacted legal firm who are also processing claims. To answer Niobe query I was working with them not for them in March.
All views expressed are my own personal views. Without prejudice
 
 

Niobe

User avatar
Posts: 5169
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:56 am
Location:

Post by Niobe » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:33 pm
Is that not the same thing?

Nobody minds who you work for as long as there is no advertising (which I know you haven't done), it's just when it appears that you are not who you seem to be that is a problem.
 
 

Jamie.73

User avatar
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:11 pm
Location:

Post by Jamie.73 » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:43 pm
Thats fine i find this forum really usefull for seeing the process from the debtor clients perspective. Main issue seems to be IVAs being kept open when they should be closed. Getting a perspective from debtor clients allows us to improve our service.
All views expressed are my own personal views. Without prejudice
 
 

Shining

User avatar
Posts: 27019
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:57 am
Location:

Post by Shining » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:58 pm
All are welcome on the forum, I'm sure your views will be valuable to some x
IVA final payment left the bank on the 26th January 2013...looking forward to a debt free future.
 
 

kieser

User avatar
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:39 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kieser » Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:23 pm
I would like David Mond to please explain why Cleardebt seem to wait until their clients have paid there final payment then drop the PPI bombshell on them.I have asked this question numerous times & the only answer i get repeatedly is & i quote

"ClearDebt have acted on this information as swiftly as possible, however, as you can appreciate there are a significant number of cases to be investigated so the Arrangements approaching completion are being prioritised".

Funny really,This PPI saga has been known for at least 12 months & Cleardebt have never mentioned it to myself,so the statement above does not ring true & i still have no clear answer to why this was not investigated lets say 6 months ago so it would have been sorted before my final payment.If i had not contaceted Cleardebt about PPI then i do not know when they would have informed me of it.

I think it really disgraceful that we have complied fully with our IVA & this is how we get treated at the end of it.

Do Cleardebt not understand what ive been through the last 6 years (my doing completely,of course)& that i want & demand that i get on with my life immediately.I have followed the rules,now please let me get on with my life.
 
 

Heretoday

User avatar
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:51 pm
Location:

Post by Heretoday » Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:15 pm
Hi Kieser

Whilst David is no doubt busy dealing with the
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>significant number of cases to be investigated
he does seem to be following the activity on this forum so no doubt will want to respond to your points.

A question for Jamie.73:

As someone who works in the PPI reclaims industry, are you aware of the arrangements in place with any IP or IVA company with regard to commission or introductory fees? To clarify, is it possible for an IP or IVA company to profit by referring one of their debtors to a claims management company who in turn will pay that IP or IVA company either a finder’s fee or commission etc.?
7 years after starting an IVA I finally received a completion certificate from ClearDebt
 
 

Jamie.73

User avatar
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:11 pm
Location:

Post by Jamie.73 » Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:51 am
Hi Heretoday

this is an interesting point. Speaking for myself and based on meetings I have had it is clear that a legal firm is within its rights to offer a refferal fee. However i am not sure if that firm should be able to accept such a fee. I have had meetings with a senior experienced IP who is on the liscensing board and his view was a introducers fee could not be accepted. On the other hand others believe it can. I beleive that an IVA firm would be absolutley fine putting in a timed cost however. This issue with us any how has only been raised in the event of completed / closed IVAs. A bigger issue is that of set off which claims management companies seem to be unable to deal with as they have no legal muscle. (Please note these are strictly my personal opinions)
All views expressed are my own personal views. Without prejudice
 
 

Heretoday

User avatar
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:51 pm
Location:

Post by Heretoday » Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:26 am
It is just that the claims managment company that I was forced to use have the following on their web site:
http://www.simmscarmichael.co.uk/introducers/

“HAVE A CURRENT DATABASE WITH IVA OR DEBT MANAGEMENT CLIENTS?”

“WANT TO EARN FANTASTIC RATES OF COMMISSION?”

This gives the impression that commission is being paid.
7 years after starting an IVA I finally received a completion certificate from ClearDebt
171 posts Page 5 of 12
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”