Changing the way my wife's wages are assessed ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
30 posts Page 2 of 2
 
 

melodybaines

User avatar
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:17 pm
Location:

Post by melodybaines » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:42 pm
I appreciate that they are entitled to claim back any surplus money. I have as I have always done kept 50% and saved 50% of any excess to pay into my iva as per the terms and conditions, so I am in a position to pay this money. What surprised and upset me was the threatening tone of the letter. I have never once missed a payment in 3 years and have always sent payslips for review on time. I can`t do anything until they have reviewed my payslips.
 
 

plasticdaft

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 9562
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by plasticdaft » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:52 pm
I think sometimes the way letters are written is rather poor.

Paul
Discharged today the 8th feb 2012. View is much brighter now.
Continuing to rebuild our credit worthiness.
 
 

plasticdaft

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 9562
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by plasticdaft » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:53 pm
I think sometimes the way letters are written is rather poor.

Paul
Discharged today the 8th feb 2012. View is much brighter now.
Continuing to rebuild our credit worthiness.
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77177
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:24 pm
My income varies from month to month and I assume that they average out my income over the three months.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:29 pm
My policy is to always revert to basic wages for proposals and annual reviews. The IVA protocol makes it clear what happens with uplifted sums, and I do not feel that it is fair to move the goalposts halfway through an IVA - unless you are receiving a new set benefit which has effectively increased your guaranteed income.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Ian.70

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:30 am

Post by Ian.70 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:40 pm
Many thanks for that Melanie

Is there any particular part of the protocol I could quote in future correspondence with payplan?

Our income is no different now since our IVA began and at our annual reiew in April they even reduced our payments.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:41 pm
You can only really use the protocol if your IVA is protocol compliant. Is this the case in your IVAs?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Ian.70

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:30 am

Post by Ian.70 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:46 pm
Thay are both with payplan.

How would I check this?
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77177
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:49 pm
How long have you been in your IVA?
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:49 pm
It should make it clear on the front page of the proposals.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Ian.70

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:30 am

Post by Ian.70 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:54 pm
I'e just seen a line in our 'report of the nominees' document which states "The nominee having reviewed the proposals believes that they are protocol compliant".
Does this mean our iva's are protocol compliant?
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:01 pm
It does - and salaries should be based upon "normal take-home pay". Is it the case that your wife's salary is consistently higher than when the IVA was taken out, and that your IP has recalculated the basic salary accordingly - including some of the extra funds?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Ian.70

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:30 am

Post by Ian.70 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:08 pm
Her average take home pay has never changed. The iva was never based on her take home pay. They told us it would be based on her basic pay because if they done it on take home pay and she was off sick we wouldn't afford the payments. They told us only o/time and bonuses would increase our payments and this is how they've managed it so far.
 
 

Ian.70

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:30 am

Post by Ian.70 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:24 pm
Sorry Melanie, if I could ask 1 further question.
Does 'normal take-home pay' include or exclude any night and weekend enhancements (is it the actual net pay)?
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:29 am
It really depends on what her "normal take home pay" actually comprises of. Sorry but I can't advise you about specifics - merely to say that the review ought to be based on the same basis of salary calcualation that was used for the proposal - unless an error had been made at the proposal drafting stage of course.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
30 posts Page 2 of 2
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”