bank charges and mortgage that was misold

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
16 posts Page 1 of 2
 
 

sharon555

User avatar
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:03 pm

Post by sharon555 » Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:30 am
hi financial os is trying to get me back bank charges and mortgage that was misold,which if get all back it amounts to about 14000,owe 14,900 left to iva ,what would be good f&f offer be,and also if dont get it all back can we keep 50% of it thanks
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77177
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:52 am
Hi,

You might find that if you get back the bank charges that the bank will keep them to offset against your loan, which in turn means that your other creditors will receive a greater dividend.

If you do get them back, I don't know if you would be allowed to offer this as a full and final or not. Bear in mind that you owe the full amount of your debt until the IVA is finished, and this may just mean that you pay more back.

As to keeping any, this is something you would have to sort out with your IP.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:44 pm
This is likely to be a windfall, if the banks do decide to refund you directly rather than reduce their claims. When you say you owe £14,900, is that the balance of the remaining contributions or the full amount you still owe to creditors?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

sharon555

User avatar
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:03 pm

Post by sharon555 » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:18 pm
hi thats the balance of the remaining contributions
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:34 pm
I think on that basis it is doubtful whether you could use reclaimed money from your creditors to offer a full and final settlement. The monies will be captured under the windfall provisions and you will continue to make your monthly repayments in the usual manner.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

sharon555

User avatar
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:03 pm

Post by sharon555 » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:41 pm
the bank charges are from a creditor,but the mortgage fee is not from a creditor and we are not with that company now,say if we got full compensation from the mortgage company would i be in a position to offer then thanks
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:43 pm
Still a windfall sorry!
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:44 pm
It might be acceptable to creditors as you will have done a lot of work to get this money back and creditors will enjoy the benefit. You would need clarification from your IP who may need to consult with creditors but if you do not chase this money it will be lost. Get the okay before you get the money back or it could just be treated as a windfall.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

MRBLUESKY

User avatar
Posts: 2870
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:04 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MRBLUESKY » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:37 pm
it seems to me that these compensation cases regarding bank charges, misold mortgages etc.are better persued after iva,s are concluded.would you agree melanie.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:39 pm
No - if there is a genuine claim to be made, which other creditors can share from, then I think it is right to do that as soon as possible.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

MRBLUESKY

User avatar
Posts: 2870
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:04 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MRBLUESKY » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:49 pm
thats right for the creditors, but what about the debtors rights.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:50 pm
I would suggest that they come after paying creditors in full, wouldn't you?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

MRBLUESKY

User avatar
Posts: 2870
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:04 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MRBLUESKY » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:55 pm
no because creditors have been proven to be irresponsible in lending thats why we are in the middle of a world recession.they have been driven by greed,most debtors have borrowed to consolidate debt through desperation.
Last edited by MRBLUESKY on Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
 

Skippy

User avatar
Posts: 20720
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Skippy » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:57 pm
Maybe creditors were irresponsible, but we also have to take responsibility for borrowing (and spending) the money.
 
 

MRBLUESKY

User avatar
Posts: 2870
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:04 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MRBLUESKY » Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:09 pm
what do you say to thousands of people that have lost their jobs,through no fault of their own, but down to the banking fuelled recession,then they have no money to pay their mortgages.so end up homeless, is it their fault they got a mortgage. would it be better for us all to live in a communist council housing nation, where the state pays our rent if we become unemployed,then there would be no need for personal ip.s etc.and borrowing be restricted to say £1000 a year per adult pending on employment status,that should help sort the national personal debt out ,what do you think banks.
Last edited by MRBLUESKY on Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
16 posts Page 1 of 2
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”