As crazy and ridiculous as this may sound. I just found out that Northern Rock has used a post from this forum and particular Melanie Giles in its defense of the case recently brought against them for not treating customers fairly. See
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/sto ... 47,00.html
In their answer to the court Northern Rock said:
---
9. Despite the irrelevance of the evidence submitted, purely as a clarification for the courts benefit, it is not the case that the Claimant rejects IVA proposals capriciously. At BA1 I exhibit a copy of an extract from online IVA forum, iva.co.uk, dated 18 September. I refer the court to the comments of IP Melanie Giles, to evidence this which are self explanatory.
---
So how does everyone feel having Northern Rock take Melanie's post, actually on 14 September, and use it as evidence to say they don't reject IVAs unfairly or treat customers unfairly?
Steve