Hi sb
I'm with your IP all the way on this one - I could agree with Andy with regard to overtime payments where there probably does need to be some incentive to work harder - but this relates to a pay rise and is hardly the same thing.
Put it this way, had you not been in an IVA, but still struggling to make your contractual payments to creditors, the pay rise would have been a god send in that you could have paid more off the debts and cleared them earlier. The same principle should apply during the IVA as well.
If your IP accepts any less than you are required to retain for your usual household needs, he/she is not carrying out his/her duties appropriately for creditors. If you cannot see where this is referred to in the IVA proposal, ask your IP to point this out to you.
I have noted that you will be paying back more than £10,000 more than the total debt - which I assume represent the IP's fees and disbursements. How much interest do you think you would have had to pay over a five year period, had your creditors not agreed to your IVA? Probably a lot more, and in the meantime you have gained the certainty that they cannot commence or continue with any form of legal action against you. It seems a very fair deal to me.
I kmow that my reply will not be popular amongst our regular forum members, but as an IP in practice - we can often be unpopular, but we have to do our job properly and I think your supervisor is. Try and negotiate on the £900 figure - my gut feeling is that if you are being completely co-operative, rather than complaining against their decision, this may buy you some goodwill.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
For further details contact me at
http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at:
http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk