equity release

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
17 posts Page 1 of 2
 
 

Dixie

User avatar
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:22 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Dixie » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:47 am
Does anyone know how Cleardebt use the equity release clause. Ours has been extended with only 4k equity after 85% LTV they are saying it is anything over 5k at 100% LTV to extend? Ours is a protocol compliant IVA.
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:23 am
This may be something to do with the modifications or an older Protocol case. There have been a number of threads concerning this where Protocol wording can be interpreted in different ways and many people have found themselves with extensions despite perhaps the intention being otherwise.

You need to speak with Cleardebt and ask them why the IVA was extended but it could be because of confusing and conflicting wording in the Protocol terms and conditions. We were advised not to use them due to the conflicts so I cannot say for sure how they work in operation.
Last edited by Michael Peoples on Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

Lisa Thomas

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 7759
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:26 am

Post by Lisa Thomas » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:51 am
Hi Dixie - I would ask them to give you a written explanation of their calculations and how they have arrived at the basis used.
I'm a licensed IP with 16+ yrs at Neville & Co covering the South West area. I have a YouTube channel with advisory videos on here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMPTTu ... Z5k9ZcC2MA http://www.nevilleco.co.uk 01752 786800 Lisa@nevilleco.co.uk
 
 

Dixie

User avatar
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:22 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Dixie » Tue Jul 07, 2015 12:28 pm
Thank you.

I have contacted them today and they are saying it's right.

My proposal says if my share in the property is less than £5000 gross then the property will be excluded and no extension required?

After working out the 85% LTV there was just over 9k left between myself and my husband, so less then 5k each?

Perhaps i am reading it wrong.
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Tue Jul 07, 2015 12:59 pm
Your proposal states that if your equity is less than £5,000 gross then no extension is required. Unfortunately your equity can be deemed to be more than £5,000 gross because this figure can refer to a sale rather than a remortgage at 85% loan to value. This is one of the problems with the old Protocol cases which hopefully were addressed in 2014.

The only people who can give you a definitive answer are Cleardebt so you need to get them to show you how they calculated the equity and which terms/conditions or modifications were applied.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

winter_blues

User avatar
Posts: 538
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:06 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by winter_blues » Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:24 pm
That is true but the spirit in the 2014 Protocol should be reflected to earlier cases.
Winter-Blues
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:36 pm
I agree but that would require clarification from creditors and probably anther meeting. Where there is doubt the IP would not have the discretion to intrepret what ought to have been said and to protect themselves would need legal opinion.

As I have said we never used Protocol T&Cs following advice and have always used R3. Therefore I am only interpreting and giving my opinion on the Prototol T&Cs as they seem to have conflicts and holes.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:43 pm
If you want spirit see a faith representative.

The protocols are badly worded documents developed by a committee coordinated by a government department.

They represent everything that is bad and are case examples of how not to do something.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33395
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:55 pm
The letter of the law often conflicts with the spirit of the law due to the way our laws "evolve", in the same way as the Protocols and various Ts&Cs evolve in the insolvency world.

We British don't tent to scrap and replace -- but potch and add bits here and there (often conflicting bits) --- Actually we are one of the few nations that do that with out architecture too and the only idiots who renovate old French, Spanish and Italian ruins --- anyway, that is by the by :-)

So ... the spirit often requires the intervention of a judge to make it the letter, this doesn't happen a lot in these cases as we, the debtors, have very few resources (money) and the creditors have a little more !
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:05 pm
...and the presumption is that no-one can force an IP to change a decision.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

Dixie

User avatar
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:22 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Dixie » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:12 pm
It just amazes me how all IVA companies are allowed to interpret the same information differently. Surely it should be interpreted the same for every case?
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:26 pm
To be fair Dixie the IPs have to be careful not to leave themselves personally liable. If in doubt it is important to seek legal advice and creditor opinion.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:34 pm
I believe that of the smaller firms where the IP's are closer to the initial client.

There is too much coming through around the larger firms linked to whether they even check what staff have done.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

Dixie

User avatar
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:22 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Dixie » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:50 pm
Michael,

What would happen if your property was worth 150k and your mortgage was for say 139k, you couldn't remortgage because not at 85%, but would the iva still be extended because of being over 5k each?

Thank you
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Tue Jul 07, 2015 6:08 pm
That depends on how your IVA is worded and the de minimis clause.

GT have been taking an interpretation that says £5k can only be split between the 2 of you.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
17 posts Page 1 of 2
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”