iamfubb2 writes "The DMP (CCCS) would last for 8 years and 8 months and i presume the IVA(Payplan) would be for 5 years at a similar premium. Just seems from info and comments on the forum and elsewhere, that a DMP has more "flexibilty" than an IVA and, starts paying creditors more quickly therefore , avoiding extra interest and fees. I have had a few estimates from independent IVA companies and the norm seems to be 2 months premium upfront and, 17.50% of same after that, which in effect would be adding to my debt in the short-term."
There is so much wrong with that statement that it is difficult to know where to start. I am in no way having a pop at iamfubb2 by the way, but it, to my mind, reinforces some of the popular mis-conceptions that may exist elsewhere.
It isn't necessarily true that a DMP has more flexibility at all. IVA payments can be amended very easily, things like payment breaks etc can be arranged. Whilst these courses may not be ideal, it stands to reason that reducing a DMP payment, or missing one, is not ideal either. "A DMP starts paying creditors more quickly therefore avoiding extra extra interest and fees". Garbage, absolute codswallop. Yes, a creditor will start seeing money quicker on a DMP than an IVA, but as you can't force them to freeze interest on a DMP then you run a significant risk that they won't. On an IVA, the interest and charges have to be frozen by law once accepted, so the timescale where they don't receive money is irrelevant. You will run up far more in the way of interest and charges in the short term on a DMP than you will on an IVA in 99.9% of cases for that very reason.
The fees described by iamfubb2 seem to bear more relation to a DMP than an IVA, I don't know of many IP firms that would charge 2 payments upfront, and the fee afterwards looks more like a DMP as well. The timescale is significant as well. Estimated 104 months on a DMP (may be much more if they don't freeze interest) or, typically, 60 months on an IVA. I applaud anyone who takes a deliberate decision to repay creditors in full, but financially there is little comparison. Of course, BR could well work out very much cheaper even than an IVA and so should also be considered. Whatever way a debtor chooses to address the problem is entirely their decision, but to start the journey without being in possession of the full pros and cons of all solutions is just not right.