Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:45 am
Hi All
Just need to clear up a bit of confusion I think! I thought rightly or wrongly that the modifications contained in the chairmans report overrode what was in the proposal? Can someone clarify that please?
Point in question is our proposal said that we would make an extra 6 payments to cover any equity in the house = 66 payments. On the day of the creditors meeting it the remortgage clause at month 54 was put in - Which I understand but also it stated that 60 payments to be paid and the IVA completed in 63 months. Had a communication from our case worker this week which stated that the payments would still run for 66 months unless we could remortgage when I questioned the modification about 60 payments she said unless we could remortgage to an acceptable sum (although it doesn't say anything about an amount in the chairmans report) we would still have to pay for 66 months.
So now I'm well confused [?] Please help
Thanks
Rainbow
Just need to clear up a bit of confusion I think! I thought rightly or wrongly that the modifications contained in the chairmans report overrode what was in the proposal? Can someone clarify that please?
Point in question is our proposal said that we would make an extra 6 payments to cover any equity in the house = 66 payments. On the day of the creditors meeting it the remortgage clause at month 54 was put in - Which I understand but also it stated that 60 payments to be paid and the IVA completed in 63 months. Had a communication from our case worker this week which stated that the payments would still run for 66 months unless we could remortgage when I questioned the modification about 60 payments she said unless we could remortgage to an acceptable sum (although it doesn't say anything about an amount in the chairmans report) we would still have to pay for 66 months.
So now I'm well confused [?] Please help
Thanks
Rainbow