Page 1 of 1

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 11:16 am
by Max
I posted sometime ago about a local District Registrar who refused a creditor's petition on the grounds that the debtor had not been given the opportunity to consider other options - in the local paper it is reported that the same Judge did exactly the same last week. I am wondering if it is this particular Judge who is being sympathetic or a change of attitude by the Judiciary in principle. J

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 11:27 am
by kallis3
I have a feeling that all judges are supposed to check that you have received the appropriate advice about your options before granting bankruptcy.

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 11:31 am
by Skippy
I was asked if I had taken advice before the judge granted my BR. When I said that my IP had advised me he asked had I taken any further advice to make sure it was in my best interests.

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 12:38 pm
by Julie
Same here, both the clerk and the judge asked if hubby had taken advice and by whom.

Assuming the individuals had not taken advice, the judge is right.