Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 11:35 am
Hi all,
I owe halifax around £6.5k and have received a letter from Moorcroft Debt Collectors. The initial debt was for £6k and I started paying via a debt management plant through Payplan payment. Over 2 years I paid approx £3k but stopped paying when I realised that my debt was still around £5.4k because of interest. All my other creditors had stopped interest but these lot continued. Anyway I now intend to argue with them that the outstanding amount should be £3.5k (which I am happy to pay off in instalments) but have also said that i am happy to go to court and argue my point. As a side issue I'm also going to highlight that ALL my debt was primarily gambling - bet365/betfair etc - and that they shouldn't have continued giving me credit/or stopped my card when they noticed that over the course of a year they could see i was wasting my/their money. I am a recovering gambling addict and went through major clinical depression last year. Is this line of argument a good idea? Would they worry about the publicity? Would the judge be sympathetic? Thanks.
I owe halifax around £6.5k and have received a letter from Moorcroft Debt Collectors. The initial debt was for £6k and I started paying via a debt management plant through Payplan payment. Over 2 years I paid approx £3k but stopped paying when I realised that my debt was still around £5.4k because of interest. All my other creditors had stopped interest but these lot continued. Anyway I now intend to argue with them that the outstanding amount should be £3.5k (which I am happy to pay off in instalments) but have also said that i am happy to go to court and argue my point. As a side issue I'm also going to highlight that ALL my debt was primarily gambling - bet365/betfair etc - and that they shouldn't have continued giving me credit/or stopped my card when they noticed that over the course of a year they could see i was wasting my/their money. I am a recovering gambling addict and went through major clinical depression last year. Is this line of argument a good idea? Would they worry about the publicity? Would the judge be sympathetic? Thanks.