Page 1 of 2

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:34 pm
by Meash
Sorry for asking further basis questions....but here I go anyway. When it states that you have to remortgage for up to 85% of the value of the property.....does this mean that if your house is worth £120K, the most you can remortgate upto is around £100K?

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:19 pm
by ginger3232
Meash - It is highly unlikely that you will be able to remortgage at all.

It is worth looking at your proposal and see what it say about this - you may have to go into the motions of remortgaging only to be turned down.(pointless exercise really):-)

You also may be asked to have the property valued at current prices.

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:24 pm
by Meash
I have checked my chairmans report and it says that I have to remortgate in my final year and release any accrued equity up to 85% of the value of the property. Why would they put it in if I am unlikely to be able to do it? is it a precurser to extending for another year?

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:35 pm
by ginger3232
A few years ago - it was a lot easier to remortgage - even with Sub prime lenders and an active IVA, as you know thats changed, in the unlikely event of a sudden property "boom" i suppose the creditors are covering all their options.

Best person to find out what will happen (in your case) is your IP.

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:38 pm
by orange
we had to try to remortgage 12 months ago ...estate agents were not interested in valuation of the house ! so had to do extra year

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:24 pm
by kallis3
We're all in the same position now - I haven't known amyone who has been able to remorthage.

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:22 pm
by MelanieGiles
Unless the marketplace changes over the next few years, the current equity release provisions are pretty worthless as no-one can really obtain a remortgage if they are in an IVA. So the most likely option is an extension of the IVA for a further year.

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:25 pm
by Broke of London
There was one chap a couple of weeks ago who was offered a mortgage. God knows how but he wasn't pleased!!!

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm
by kallis3
I don't remember that one!

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:31 pm
by Broke of London
It was at sub prime rates (obviously) so everyone advised he go and get his house revalued until he got one low enough for the de minimus provision to kick in (bit dodgy in my view like hiding a windfall)!

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:32 pm
by MelanieGiles
I would prefer to call it fraud!

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:34 pm
by kallis3
I still don't remember it!

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:01 am
by Broke of London
I think so many people now see the equity clause as a formality that there will be a few disgruntled people over the next few years as lending criteria starts to ease up.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:20 am
by kallis3
In one way it wouldn't bother me if I could remortgage as the IVA would be finished in the five years and I would still be paying less. In the long run though the extra twelve months is preferable.

I can't see the lending criteria easing up for a while yet though.

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:37 am
by Shining
Be my turn next year to find out. x