Page 1 of 2

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:34 pm
by size5

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:37 pm
by Declan at DebtFreeDirect
Interesting article. Perhaps this is just the beginning?

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:41 pm
by size5
It is huge already Declan, as I am sure you are aware. I suspect that this may end up like the bank charges case, a certain number will get through, be settled before court etc and then the financial institutions will cut their losses and use all the tools at their disposal, high court action etc, to stop the haemorrage of money.

Just my opinion of course, but that is what I expect. The morals and ethics are a different story of course.

Regards.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:42 pm
by kallis3
All the 'write your debts off' companies will be quick to jump on this bandwagon.

I really don't see why her whole debt should be written off though. The PPI I can accept, I've never taken that out, but she did take out the card and regardless of commission or not (and let's face it, commission will always be paid by someone) the debt was owed.

I still call it debt avoidance, and always will.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:49 pm
by herbekj
If a signed copy of the credit agreement cannot be provided when requested then in law the whole debt is unenforcable is my understanding. Rightly or wrongly

Wonder how many banks could actually find that document if you had been using the same credit card for say 15 years or more with all the merges and closures there have been in that time.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:55 pm
by kallis3
Sorry herb, we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

As far as I am concerned, I took out the loans/credit cards and it is my duty to pay back as much as I can.

Even if I could use this 'loophole' I would never do so.

I am responsible for my debts, and would never seek to write them off via this route.

I am thankful that I have been given a chance to repay what I can.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:03 pm
by herbekj
Sorry, I wasn't agreeing with it hence I am 3 years in an IVA to pay back as much as I can and not interested in these loop holes.

But I do believe that if banks can't supply that document people can and will now start trying to walk away laughing debt free.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:11 pm
by Declan at DebtFreeDirect
I agree size5, it is becoming huge and this court case will prove to be the litmus paper in what will be an inevitable rush before the big credit institutions find a way to stop this.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:12 pm
by herbekj
In fact I guess the next round of letters telling me that I was mis-sold my IVA (Not) will all be along the lines of 'Did you IP check the debt was enforceable if not then you were mis-sold your IVA and we can fix it'

I can see it already.

Something to light the fire with I suppose to save money....

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:14 pm
by kallis3
Sorry herb - wasn't having a go at you there!

I agree that people will try to use this.

Can only hope that if they manage it, their names will be blacklisted by the firms concerned so they can't get anymore credit.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:33 pm
by Michael Peoples
I think Herb has a point as this case could affect the insolvency industry. Salespeople will be telling clients in financial trouble to avoid IVAs or bankruptcies because they do not have to pay the debts back at all. There are clearly issues in this case that will not apply across the board but it will not stop dodgy companies from quoting the details of the case and getting large fees up front.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:37 pm
by size5
True enough unfortunately.

Regards.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:23 pm
by needmoremoney
We have seen the following legal agreements also been problematic around:-

-all geared at ripping off consumers-

Payment Protection Insurance
Whole of life insurance
Extended warranties
Hospital cash plans
Mortgage endowments
Friendly society plans
Insurance bonds
Variable annuities

All of these agreement have netted less for savers but made plenty for Banks and BS.

......madness...all about the love of money and greed

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:44 pm
by size5
I have to say that unfortunately I have 2 of the products mentioned above.

An endowment on which I would lose money if I made it paid up, although it is no longer tied to the mortgage, and a hospital cash plan which pure superstition will not allow me to cancel, especially after I have just arrived back at the office now after visiting a colleague in hospital this afternoon who has fallen foul of a sudden unexpected kidney infection, and who now has MRSA.

Regards.

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:06 am
by nomoremoney
When you have Fanancial self regulation - let the Banks and BS do what they want they inadvertenly cook up those money making schemes that makes them money first and then the rest. Did I forget Bank charges....how silly of me????

The undeniable verdict is that consumers have been taken for a ride. The Recession have exposed the systemic fraud, and we needed some form of a Rapture, to be free again!

I don't condone the use of the CC to get out of debt, but like in the film the Matrix, there are anomalies that allow the little guy [NEO] to fight back against the odds and the system in unconventional ways.And as a metaphor,I see such a parallel in these court claims against CC agreements been unenforceable.

I feel that moment of enlightenment.