Page 1 of 1

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:06 pm
by OPTIMIST12
I have posted about this before but still cant get my head round it.

A number of my creditors have sold my debt onto Max Recovery. This selling on is administered by Eversheds. I am presuming therefore that Max Recovery pay Eversheds a fee.

If Max Recovery can make a profit (obviously they must do or they wouldnt do it!!!) even AFTER paying Eversheds their commission / fee why do the original creditors sell these debts on in the first place. Are they not just waving goodbye to money that will now go to a third party?

Why do the original creditors not hang onto the original accounts? There must be a reason but it is beyond my small brain. Obviuosly at the end of the day it makes no difference to the debtor - but I am just mystified.

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:39 pm
by mikebdomain
Its' all to do with cashflow, if they sell the debt today they can raise cash on the amount owed with no further administration costs.

FREE ADVICE IS THE BEST ADVICE

LEYBRIDGE LIMITED
Mortgage Broker

Specialising in adverse credit.

see feedback and testimonials at:
http://www.leybridge.com/testimonial.php
Check out my blog at:
http://mikebdomain.blogs.iva.co.uk/
Please read our Initial Disclosure Document(IDD):
http://www.leybridge.com/Leybridge-IDD.pdf

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:19 pm
by Adam Davies
Hi
I think that it may also have something to do with PR.I guess they don,t want debtors who they can no longer sell to using up their time
Regards

Andy Davie
IVA.co.uk Spokesperson

About me:
http://www.iva.co.uk/andy_davie_profile.asp

IVA Helpline: 0800 197 4838
http://www.iva.co.uk/iva_helpline.asp

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:26 pm
by OPTIMIST12
Thanks for those replies.

I would love to know the actual percentage that companies like Max pay for the debt. I have read various guestimates but presumably the actual figure is a trade secret.